There are a few proposed ways to hack a default value to form fields. The problen gets bigger when handling
CollectionTypes, as the underlying objects don’t get constructed automatically. Workarounds are numerous, e.g. simply setting
prototype_data on the
CollectionType to an instantiated object. Unfortunately, for me, not one of these worked out when working with nested CollectionTypes.
The only way that worked out for me was adding a
DataTransformer which checks in the
reverseTransform function whether the object to transform is
null, and if, set it to a new instance instead. The default values are than set in the constructor of the underlying object or in the reverseTransform function too, depending on your (performance) needs.
I sure hope this gets improved one day, but for now, this workaround is very comprehensible so I would not think about submitting an issue or pull request or even ask why this is necessary. This way, I even have more control over the new objects.Loading Likes...